Science saw that the fiction of evolution by natural selection is not a much sellable enterprise and sought another trick to deceive mankind. It produced a new canard in mutation. Mutation, defined by science itself as a sudden and spontaneous change in a cell, is generally a harmful hereditary aberration like pimples, heart disease, obesity etc. According to science, mutations are caused by radiation, viruses or errors. Mutations are generally degenerative and science, desperate to promote its fable of evolution, claims that some can be helpful. Mutation is actually the opposite of natural selection. Mutation would more likely cause a speedy cheetah to lose its gift of pursuit speed, not gain more of it, because, if the cheetah desires and works towards more speed and is aided by mutation in its offspring, mutation then would cease to be sudden and spontaneous contrary to what science claims it is. Let us say that science was just only sloppy for the time being not getting it straight, but then we haven't seen in all history naturally lacking physical features being naturally compensated except, of course, when it is divinely ordained. We haven't seen snakes growing limbs or wings despite science's claim stating they are more than hundred million years old.
Now let us weigh science's accidental life and mutation assertions by the gift of commonsense. If we allow science to have its conjecture of the first life being accidental (notwithstanding science has no clue what life really is), now the chance of obtaining life from inanimate matter or from nothing by accident is very minimal to nothing. If we set that aside considering it as just one miraculous accident, we see that every single phenomenon after it is as astonishing as life itself is. Organisms reproduce - they replicate, which is another miracle; organisms grow, still another miracle; fishes have gills that allow them to live in water, still another miracle, and birds have wings that enables them to fly in air, yet another miracle. Once can be an accident, how can billions of intricate astonishments be generated just by accident? How can billions and billions of accidents rain one after another to assemble in a maze of spectacular scene? It doesn't make sense.
Expanding the Universe
Let's explain something mathematically. Let us say there are four apples on the table.
Mr. "B" says the apples were always there. Nothing was added or taken away from the table. 4+0-0 = 4. End of explanation. It is not unconvincing.
Ms. "C" says Mr. "A" brought all the apples and put them on the table. 1x 4 = 4. End of explanation. It is not unconvincing.
Mr. "D" says two people brought two apples each and put them on the table. 2x2 = 4. End of explanation. It is not unconvincing.
Mrs. "E" says seven people brought one apple each and put them on the table. They ate three of the apples and now four apples remain. (7x1)-3 = 4. End of explanation. It is not unconvincing.
There are many ways to explain a phenomenon or a reality. Some are more convincing than others. There are millions of, maybe billions or perhaps infinite, ways to explain the phenomena unfolding in the sky that God stretched. What is certain is the heavens are there. Whether we explain them in the most splendid way or in most complex ways, the true story can be outside of human explanation, because there can be, and there are, many tempting explanations out there unuttered.
Explanations, "elegant explanations" are all that science offers now. Most of the mathematics from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics to general relativity to string theory - we are bombarded by explanations. An explanation is then promoted as fact by a consensus of "credible scholars." The mathematics that accompanies the chosen explanation is dubbed the "model" then adopted as a "law of science."
For example science's law of gravity, as supposed by Mr. Newton, is written:
F= G m1 m2/ r2
Science knows that the above expression for explaining a phenomenon of nature can, for many, appear an honest law by which matter works; but also it knows it is a fallacious explanation that purports to be a law. Science teaches it anyway saying it works for most of the things we see as if there is partial truth. Nonetheless, the point here is that, as people do, numbers also lie. As words don't lie themselves until humans assemble them to make lies with them, so also science assembles numbers to tell colossal lies.
Science speaks from England. The English now claims to have created the universe. How so? You ask. The English have built a speech generating device that enables neuron disease stricken Mr. Hawking to write onto a computer with small movements of his body from which a voice synthesizer speaks for him. An organized system tends to this man and what he says is trumpeted across the world and celebrated as the ultimate truth ever uttered regarding the universe. He says his laws have and will create the universe from nothing. Through him England is speaking and through England something else.
Science claims the universe started from a small dense state that started rapidly inflating 13.7 billion years ago. Science calls that rapid phenomenon the big bang. Since stars are observed to be receding farther away, science further claims that the universe is stretching in all directions. In fact, it is this expansion that led science to the big bang claim. Science does not say the stars are receding further away, but rather it is saying that the space between stars is stretching thereby making stars appear receding. So, it is space that is stretching because science does not want to state that the stars out in space are receding into something else since this presupposes that there is something outside of the universe. Science says there is nothing, not even space, outside the universe into which the universe is expanding. How does space expand and expand into nothing? Science enters here into a logical prison where the only thing it does is spin in circular arguments or cast some kind of abracadabra. Does the universe expand into itself? How so? If not, what is it expanding into? Science is trapped and lies bare for all to see. Science demands its adherents to imagine that there is nothing beyond the universe into which the universe expands and at the same time demands of them to imagine that the universe is expanding. Behold, science is but sophisticated soothsaying or astrology. It infers on matters it doesn't know and prognosticates like the astrologer as if it does know.
If it is space that is expanding thereby causing stars to stay more and more apart, then space is being generated from within the universe. If the space is being generated from within and can further change the apartness of giant stars and moons, then what generates this space must have massive force. Science calls it dark energy and has no clue what it is. It only calls on its adherents to imagine again here and to have faith in this dark energy. Science has a flood of speculations but not a shred of idea on what is taking place out there. How is space generated within space? How does the space between two stars change if the stars have not moved? How does space stretch? If there is any magical way of telling a sane story about that, then how does space expand without conquering more space beyond it? If it inflates into nothing, is it how nothing becomes something? Students of science are required to imagine things or abstractions that do not exist and there is a handsome incentive for doing that. How much more abracadabra can science cast? How much more of a soothsayer can it be?
Science generates mathematical models by which it claims entities of matter attract each other. It calls these models the laws of gravity. When that model failed to work for some cluster of stars, it invented an entity it named "dark matter" and required its adherents to imagine and have faith in the "dark matter" and to trust in its power to balance the error of science's model. Such is the religion called science.
Science, clearly unable to understand the maze of the universe, throws vague and self contradictory inferences about it and without the slightest clue of what it is, concludes that "God is not necessary to create the universe." The English Mr. Hawking wrote in his recent book that the universe can and will create itself because there is a law such as gravity (the law he refers to is the formula that he puts together). For that declaration all the captives of science hailed from far and near. Since the captives are held by a spell, they did not ask how science, with incomplete knowledge about the universe, concluded on who brought the universe to existence? How does science infer that the laws of gravity creates the universe when it doesn't even know what gravity is.
Despite its claim of being driven by evidence, science, in its most current form, is no more than a karmic religion or something like a psychic or an astrology enterprise. What is different about it is the magnitude of its destruction on earth, its vicious stalking and ferocious advance to devour Christianity with open mouth. Science has long been engaged in a sinister operation demanding all men, women and children to believe in what they haven't seen or heard and in that which doesn't speak or hear and in that which has no compassion such as in dark energy, dark matter, a big bang, the evolving of apes to man; while urging all to deny that which they have seen, and that which has compassion, such as the birth of Christ in a manger from the Virgin, His walking on water, His changing of water into wine, His curing of the blind by a touch, His calming of the tempest of the sea, His bringing of the dead back to life, His act of feeding thousands with few loaves of bread and fish, His being crucified on the cross, His rising from the dead, His ascension to heaven - all happening before many witnesses. Today, governments, nations and multitudes are on science's side arming it with ammunitions, nurturing it, and offering child sacrifices to it . It is injurious. It is evil. It is cruel.
Science Makes Desolate
There have been many evil deeds; collective deeds of man, on earth after Adam and Hewan (Eve) were driven out of the Garden of Eden. Included in this list are the excessive indulgence of men in sin at the time of Noah, the idolatry of men in Abraham's time, the orgy in sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, the yoke of Egypt on Israel, the persecution of the Christ in the hands of the Jews and the subsequent tearing up, desecrating, violating, pillaging, apportioning and ravening acts of nations, pagans, cults and sects against Christianity. However, the many collective transgressions of men after the resurrection of the Christ, including the dreadful Arabian conquests that ransacked Christendom, pale mere errors compared to the abomination that science is.
Besides stealing men's breath of thankfulness to God from their hearts, from their mouths and from their instruments, science makes the womb barren, turns green paradise into desert, toasts springs of water into parched soil, renders oceans lifeless, drives animals, birds and fishes into eternal extinction, speedily sucks the juice of the earth and leaves it scorched and bare, annihilates millions of men, women, children and cattle in minutes, makes the entire air on earth unbreathable, the entire water undrinkable. Science replaces compassion with greed, faithfulness with cleverness, morality with contempt and arrogant pride.
Here are few instances of desolations science has so far visited upon the earth and upon the children of God.
- God created earth with abundance of beauty and beneficial diversity of plants, animals, fish and birds - all of them useful for healthy living and for praising the Lord. Science drives about 9000 variants of these creations, each in millions, to extinction every year.
- Every 1.5 seconds, science causes a green rainforest the size of a football field to turn into a barren land.
- Due mainly to science, about four earths are needed to meet the current luxurious consumption need of the West. After another one hundred years, yet another four earths will be needed to carry western way of life one more century from there.
- Science has poisoned and continues to poison the oceans with massive amounts of mercury, antibiotics, hormones, pesticides, fungicides, lead, nuclear waste in metal drums, petrochemicals, petroleum oil, plastics etc. Science also poisons the oceans by about one million tones of polluted air every hour devastating living matter in the oceans. For this reason, as well as for science's factory-fishing, all fish in the oceans will be wiped out in about thirty six years according to some estimates from science quarters.
- A westerner pollutes the world two thousand eight hundred ten times the Ethiopian pollutes it because of science. This pollution has translated in the starvation and subsequently in the death of millions of the poor in countries bearing the yokes of the West.
- On average the poisoning of the earth's air by science has turned every person to an equivalent of a smoker who smokes thirty cigarettes a day. The difference is that a smoker smokes tobacco on top of it but the regular earth dweller takes up pesticides, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, radon, lead, cadmium, etc.
- The most devastating of the earth's desolation by science comes from genetic pollution. Genetic pollution is the transfer of gene from genetically modified organisms into God-created normal organisms. Genetically modified organisms are organisms that have been modified by the insertion of one or more genes unnaturally, by means of science (artificially). The inserted genes, which are called "transgenes," often come from a different type of animal or plant. In some cases existing genes are tweaked to modify them. The supposed idea behind this is to imbibe the genetically modified organism with certain unnatural genetic traits to the liking of science. These genetically modified organisms then breed with natural organisms and pass the modified traits on to the offspring, which then will pollute the natural traits of these organisms creating a colossal self-replicating devastation to earth and its inhabitants. It is already happening. A study from Purdue University once reported to have estimated that just 60 genetically engineered fish, which were larger and more likely to mate, and yet which had less viable offspring, released into a sea wild-population of 60,000 fish could lead to the extinction of the wild fish within 40 fish generations. Biological pollution alone is capable of turning the earth barren. Erwin Chargaff of Columbia University, the forerunner towards the discovery of "DNA double helix" once remarked, "I have the feeling that science has transgressed a barrier that should have remained inviolate . . . you cannot recall a new form of life . . . It will survive you and your children and your children's children. An irreversible attack on the biosphere is something so unheard of, so unthinkable to previous generations, that I could only wish that mine had not been guilty of it."
We have seen above, using available human population data documented over the years, that it is mathematically impossible for humans to have been in existence even many thousand years later than the timeframe science claims humans transitioned from ape to man. We also saw that Science does not have any idea how the universe works or how it came about. In multiple areas, we saw humans laboring to comprehend what God has made around us and how it is and why it is the way it is, yet we saw that none were able to find out the mysteries of His work. Humans even devised generational ladders of science, one generation stepping upon the previous height, and sought out to find the mystery of God's work, yet they did not find it; although some pompously claim to know it, yet they have no clue about it. Many hailed theories of science had come and gone; the letters in the Book of Truth are still standing. Science can not replenish the waters, it can not provide the air, it can't provide the soil and the sun with which to grow food. God can. Under God Ethiopians ate; under science they are starving. Ethiopia is not the place in which to hoist anti-Christ banners nor is it a place in which to make statements contesting God's. Ethiopians should surrender their hearts to God; not to the degrading arrogance of science, for what is against God is against Ethiopia already. Education should be remodeled by the fear of God and every child should begin speech by thankfulness to God. In schools compassion should be taught, not greed; cleverness should yield to empathy. God gave us time, ample time, to enjoy the earth with thankfulness; what is this hurried greed and running around to make pleasure at the sorrow of the other? What is this philosophy of survival of the most robbing? Whose is it? Of course, it is his that knows he has but a short time . Ethiopians should strive to restore the Government of the Lord and it will soon be time for the inhabitants of the earth to come and seek the Lord in Tsion. Ethiopia should stand to make an example of green, not pollution; of compassion, not greed; of kindness, not cleverness; of thankfulness, not arrogance. Then nations will beat their machineguns into plowshares and their bombs into construction tools. If Ethiopians do not see the signs and seek the Lord, it is possible that trouble will be seeking them.
1 Daniel 12:11
Holiness to the Lord, who endlessly refreshes the air and replenishes the water, the food, the pleasure, the strength, the health, the breath, the sound, the sight and all the joy that He has bestowed on us!
February 26, 2012
2 Matthew 24:15, Mark 13:14
3 Isaiah 14:12, Luke 10:18
4 Almost every child's innocent and blank mind on earth is now being given up to science at schools
5 Revelation 12:12